Archive for December, 2007

A very short history of Web Development

Friday, December 28th, 2007 by Sharon Marie Sutherlin

Long ago in far away land… OK… this is a very short history!

By 2000, I think every person in the developed world had a brother-in-law,  a twice-removed cousin, or a neighbor who created websites on the side who was using Frontpage and a pirated copy of Photoshop. 

Today, it’s a whole different story folks! Today, web development projects consist of a variety of ever-changing web hosting technologies, diverse teams of back-end developers, front-end developers, graphic artists, UI designers, database and systems administrators, search engine marketing experts, analytics specialists, copywriters, web tool developers, and editors. The industry has simply grown so specialized, so quickly, that one person can hardly be a master of anything more than a single strand in the web.

Professional, revenue-generating websites are an investment and should be taken very seriously. I, Your Royal Webness,  can spot an amatuer website in a matter of seconds. Go ahead… send me a link and test me. This could be quite fun!

And away we go… your comments?

Those pesky competitors!

Friday, December 28th, 2007 by Sharon Marie Sutherlin

Let’s talk about your competitors, shall we?

When planning your business strategy and your website, you need to research and understand your competition. It is crucial to study your main competitors’ websites to get a better understanding of how they use the Internet to promote their products and services and improve customer relationships.

EASY, EASY, EASY…
It is quite easy to conduct a simple but effective competitive website audit. First, identify your competitors and find out if they have a website. When you have compiled a list of competitors that have a web presence, examine each site in detail. Approach each site as though you were a potential customer, noting what you like and don’t like about their site. Pay particular attention to content (useful, current and relevant?) and design (easy to use, intuitive navigation, and professional?). Try to identify the four or five key tasks your competitors want their clients to accomplish online.

You can ask a few friends to evaluate your competitors’ sites as well. Have them compile a similar list of what they found most useful (or useless) about your competitors’ sites, and see if their impressions were similar to your own.

And away we go… now let’s talk about your pesky competitors!

A Quick Project Management Analysis

Friday, December 28th, 2007 by Sharon Marie Sutherlin

Over the weekend, I was discussing a couple of projects with a highly esteemed colleague of mine ;0). She was putting together an estimate for a company on a complete site redesign and functionality upgrade and was having problems putting together a solid estimate. In the meantime, I was in the thick of putting together a RFP response myself, so I thought I’d share my approach for creating solid estimates:

For your web development project, make sure your project manager helps you break everything down to the smallest steps/pieces possible.

Break the tasks into individual pieces that you and others can quickly wrap your heads around. Is each task “easy” or ”hard” or “compressible.”

AN ANALOGY
For example, how long does it take to get to work? For my colleague to get to her biggest customer’s site, it’s “about 45 minutes”.

First, she drives to the Metro station - 8 to 15 minutes depending on traffic.
Then, she walks from the parking lot to the platform - 2 to 3 minutes.
Then, she waits for the train - 0 to 10 minutes.
Then, she rides the train into downtown - 20 to 25 minutes.
Finally, she walks the two blocks to the office - 3 to 5 minutes.

The estimate of ”about 45 minutes” is actually more like “33 to 58 minutes”. What are the variables? Which variables are easy, hard, or compressible?

The train ride is a fixed duration. That’s easy. Also, the final walk from the station to the office is fixed due to the traffic lights. These two tasks cannot be compressed. Translation: Therefore, they’re unaffected by a crunch or deadline. 

Waiting for the train is also non-compressible because the trains come at regular intervals. Other than catching an earlier train, there’s nothing she can do reduce this duration. Translation: In a web development project, this would map to some of the early design plans. By brainstorming early during the first round of requirements, good ideas will rise to the top while eliminating bad ideas at the same time.  

Therefore, the only variables to be adjusted are the first two items.

First, she could run from the parking lot to the train platform. This doesn’t buy her much unless she can make an earlier train and reduce the waiting from from 10 to 0-1 minutes. If she doesn’t make the train, she has simply exchanged a walking minute for a waiting minute, the gain is zilch, and the frustration is high. Translation: In a web development project, it is best to limit *emergencies* and only request them when they are absolutetly necessary.

Finally, are there any variables about the drive to the Metro? This drive is 13-25% of the total travel time, but the routes are limited. She can’t drive through people’s front yards, but she can use her previous experiences to find faster routes. Translation: In project development terms, this would be an opportunity to save time (when needed) on custom development and use a web tool (web software) library in order to demonstrate a prototype. Regardless, this is the perfect time to get creative and adjust as the situation evolves.

The moral of this quick analysis: When you create your personal project plans, what kind of detail do you analyze? Do you say “paint the bedroom” or do you say “compare and contrast paint colors, coordinate the paint day, analyse what tools are available and what tools or supplies need to be purchased, move the furniture, tape the borders, lay down the dropcloths, and paint the walls”? I would assert that “paint the bedroom” is all but meaningless and conceals vital information while the second decription actually gives your project crew a clue and allows work to commence in an effective and efficient manner.

Project Management: A Definition

Friday, December 28th, 2007 by Sharon Marie Sutherlin

von Moltke’s dictum says that “No battle plan survives first contact with the enemy.” Having a project plan at the beginning of the project is a first step, but it’s not the last. Regular evaluation, adjustment, and sometimes even retreat is necessary.

With that said, here is the official definition of Project Management:

Project management is the discipline of organizing and managing resources (e.g. people) in such a way that the project is completed within defined scope, quality, time and cost constraints. A project is a temporary and one-time endeavor undertaken to create a unique product or service, which brings about beneficial change or added value. This property of being a temporary and one-time undertaking contrasts with processes, or operations, which are permanent or semi-permanent ongoing functional work to create the same product or service over and over again. The management of these two systems is often very different and requires varying technical skills and philosophy, hence requiring the development of project managements.

If you’re not regularly reevaluating your project plan, you’re not managing… you’re coasting.

And away we go… your comments please? What’s your key to success in the project management area?

Sincerely,
Your Royal Webness
a.k.a. Sharon Marie Sutherlin